This might take some time.
I've recently rejoined ADF. The production values for their membership materials have gone up significantly since I first joined back in '98. I haven't yet begun to read through them but I've thus far gleaned that the Dedicant's Program is still a thing, a thing I intend to begin Soon[tm].
I'll also be joining the Troth within the next week. They don't permit training in their clergy program until you've been a member for a year, which is fortuitous timing as the Dedicant's Program is one year long.
(This is arguably not the time of year to be undertaking new endeavors, but all we have is Now.)
I've begun to read up on shamanism, seidr, and the runes. I don't set aside a lot of my vanishingly-small leisure time for reading, I'm sad to say, so such research is slow going.
But I have to confess, I'm not sure why I'm doing these things. And that's been bothering me.
I have the sense that developing a relationship with the divine will enrich my life. I remember when my faith was strong and the way to the other worlds was easily walked, and I remember being happier then. Whether or not this can be attributed to the presence of the divine in my life, I cannot say -- it's possible that I was happier because I had friends, love, a social group, all things that I'm presently lacking. Only one way to find out, of course.
More than that, though, I feel that delving into the mysteries is important, though I can't put my finger on exactly why I feel that way. Sure, I seek power, but I'm not sure why. I seek knowledge, but I'm not sure why. I'm trying to figure these things out at the same time I'm walking this path, mostly because I like to know "why."
But ah, which path do I walk? Saying "a Druidic one" is kind of a pat answer, since I'm not sure anyone can fully describe what a Druidic path really is. And in any case, as much as I embrace the label, I'm a little uncomfortable doing so what with my Norse leanings.
On the other hand, it might be worthwhile to separate the two: keeping Druidism as outlook and practice, while seeking to develop a relationship with the Norse deities.
Let me talk about what I believe, what I know, and perhaps that'll help underline why I'm conflicted.
1. There is a Creator, who is remote and unknowable.
This is Deistic thinking, but nevertheless I believe it to be true. I believe that whatever created the cosmos resides outside the cosmos. It cannot be known, it cannot be understood, it cannot be interacted with, and it does not care for the particular fate of any being within the cosmos. This is not the Christian God, nor is it Allah, or any other prime deity; though some aspects I've described here have bled through to those lesser beings.
I tend to refer to this being/principle as God, simply out of cultural custom and a sense of poetry; references to God below should not be taken as referring to the Christian, or any other, prime deity.
2. There are many gods.
I'm a hard polytheist. I believe that the most likely scenario is that any being conceived of as a god is probably actually a god, though some of them get more attention than others. As to the nature of the gods? That one's harder to pin down. My current thinking on the subject is that the gods are, in a sense, memes -- information patterns, encoded symbolic teachings, though imbued with a sentience of their own. The gods are able to interact with mortals, and might even be able to influence fate or events in the physical world -- but any such workings are, in my opinion, just as likely to be the unconscious workings of the beneficiary.
I believe that man (thinkers, free-willed beings) creates the gods, and the gods rely on man in order to exist. Nevertheless, the gods are far wiser and more knowledgeable than any man could hope to be, and are therefore worthy of the utmost respect.
3. God is he who groks.
To grok is to understand something so thoroughly that it becomes a part of the thinker, and the thinker becomes a part of the thing. It goes beyond knowledge to an instinctual understanding. God, the Creator, is he who groks -- and so is man. Man is, therefore, God, endowed with free will and the ability to choose. Man creates his own reality, layered atop and interacting with the Real cosmos.
4. Magic is real
We define "magic" here as "interacting with and influencing the world via non-physical/empirical means." It is a manifestation of the previous principle -- all people, to a greater or lesser degree, create their own reality through the choices they make, but all people also have access to influence the Real through their own will.
I suspect that Plato was onto something when he described the world of Forms in The Republic. As a computer programmer, I see a lot of similarity between the Forms and object classes. I suspect that magic, broadly put, is a means of accessing "hidden functions" that are contained within the Forms.
5. The Earth is an egg
And here we begin to move into a bit of Gnostic thinking. The Gnostic idea of the world as a prison holds some appeal to me, but I think there's more to it than that. I believe in the sentience of the Earth (given my prior experiences I'd be foolish not to), so I don't look down on the physical world the way most Gnostics would. However, I do believe that the physical world, like an egg, is a cage -- it nurtures and sustains us, but only so that we can grow strong enough to break free. A chick who remains within the egg eventually starves to death. It must hatch, and so must we.
6. The ultimate purpose of life is to return to the divine.
I don't know how humans got here. I don't know if the cosmos was created because the Creator was lonely, or if we are fragments of God trapped here by the Demiurge, or if sentience is an emergent quality of the cosmos, or what. What I do feel sure of is that the ultimate purpose of life is apotheosis -- the return to and union with the divine. I do not know how this can be achieved. I believe that there are manifold paths that lead to the summit of the mountain, and which one a person walks depends greatly on that person.
I believe that the purpose of the Kindreds (gods, spirits, and ancestors) is to guide us, to teach us, to help us learn how to climb the mountain. The purpose of the Earth, meanwhile, is to sustain us until we are strong enough to make the journey. She is to be revered and honored as Mother to us all, but all children must grow up and leave the nest eventually.
Ultimately I think the way to the divine lies in grokking God, which introduces a paradox -- as I stated in my first premise, God/the Creator is remote and unknowable, and therefore cannot be fully grokked. So where does that leave us? I'm not sure yet.
That was actually easier than I thought it would be. Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, this doesn't leave me fitting neatly into any particular category. This is not, in itself, important, but it does make seeking a community of like-minded believers somewhat troublesome.
On the other hand, it occurs to me that everything that I've described here is a metaphysic -- an attempt to describe the manner in which the cosmos is ordered.. Interestingly, most pagan faiths don't deal in metaphysics so much as they do in ethics and virtue -- right behavior and values. Certainly there are attempts to describe the Creation and that which comes after life in the myths of each culture, but these descriptions are typically more structural than they are metaphysical. (It's the difference between describing a tree in three dimensions, and establishing that there are three dimensions to begin with.)
So to summarize, I suppose that "where I am" is preparing to undertake the journey of coming to know the Norse gods in a Druidic fashion, and hopefully not annoying them by so doing. I think I also have to re-learn how to think Druidically, so to speak -- I can't describe how it used to be but I feel as though I'm out of practice doing it.
Nevertheless, we must begin.
No comments:
Post a Comment